|HOME | DECISION TOOLS | TSETSE FAQ | BAIT TECHNOLOGIES | ABOUT US | SEARCH|
Management and socio-economics of tsetse control
Because any tsetse control strategy will take some time to achieve an initial drop of tsetse populations to planned or acceptable levels, livestock-owners during that time will be faced with both:
The additional cost to them during this period can be considered an entry or transitional cost. It can be estimated as half the existing estimates or quantifications of costs of trypanosomiasis, over a period in which it can reasonably be expected that tsetse populations will drop to the new level.
With some technical options (especially dipping) there will also be a need for initial capital investment (dips, traps, storerooms, vehicles).
These problems can be managed in two ways:
Transitional subsidies are a tool used worldwide and viewed as “a powerful means to achieve change while maintaining community acceptance” (Young 1999). Even during a time when subsidies to agriculture are generally viewed negatively, governments and donors regard them as acceptable because they are time-limited, and can be viewed as compensation for specific costs involved in a change to a new technology. For example, in developed countries such as Sweden they have been used to encourage transition to less polluting agricultural practices.